Search ARMI Database

Frog and toad surveys often rely on auditory detections of calling individuals to determine where species are and are not present. Examples include the volunteer-based USGS – North American Amphibian Monitoring Program and some of the ARMI monitoring projects. To ensure the accurate conclusions are made from survey data, it is important to reduce errors in the data from auditory surveys and to account for observational uncertainty when estimating trends. Although methods to deal with missed detections (a species is present but was not recorded) are well developed, less attention has been given to false positive errors (species that were not present are recorded).

Two experiments conducted by ARMI researchers in the past 2 years highlight the need to account for false positive errors when interpreting survey results. We used an automated broadcast system to simulate typical conditions for call surveys (Frog Radio). Thirty-six observers who are involved with monitoring frogs and toads participated in the Frog Radio experiments, logging more than 100,000 observations. A major finding was that, when recording observations under typical field conditions that include multiple calling species, background noise, and repeated observations, even the most experienced observers made a significant number of false positive errors. Overall, we found 5-8% of recorded observations were for species that were not actually played.

False positive errors are a significant component of many ecological data sets, not only auditory surveys. Error rates such as those observed during the Frog Radio experiment, can lead to severe biases in conclusions about ecological systems if they are not accounted for. This motivated us to develop new statistical methods to account for false positive errors when estimating trends in species occurrence. We built on existing methods that account for missed detections, to jointly deal with both error types. We demonstrated the new methods using call survey and visual encounter data for frogs and toads in and around the C&O Canal National Historic Park.

Results published in:

McClintock, B.T., L.L. Bailey, K.H. Pollock, and T.R. Simons. 2010. Experimental investigation of observation error in anuran call surveys. Journal of Wildlife Management 74:1882-1893.

Miller, David A., James D. Nichols, Brett T. McClintock, Evan H. Campbell Grant, Larissa L. Bailey, and Linda A. Weir. 2011. Improving occupancy estimation when two types of observational error occur: non-detection and species misidentification. Ecology 92:1422–1428.

ARMI scientists met in St Louis, MO the week of November 13th for their annual meeting to discuss their latest findings and brainstorm future projects. This team of experts in ecology, hydrology, and statistics from USGS discussed their latest findings from research on climate change, adaptive management, hydrological modeling, emerging diseases, pesticides, invasive species, habitat restoration, and population monitoring. ARMI's research portfolio is diverse to correspond with the wide variety of stressors that impact amphibian populations. ARMI provides the essential scientific information to support management actions for the restoration and conservation of the nation's amphibians.

Streams harbor many secretive and rare species that are difficult to find and study. Under the Amphibian Research and Monitoring Initiative, USGS scientists and their partners developed and demonstrated an efficient protocol for detecting the DNA of stream-dwelling amphibians that occur in low density in fast-moving water. The simple protocol is widely applicable to inventory and monitoring efforts across large watersheds, and could revolutionize surveys for various stream-dwelling amphibians the way that sampling fur for the DNA has for elusive mammals. (David Pilliod is a scientist and frequent ARMI collaborator at the Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, USGS)

Results were published in: Goldberg CS, Pilliod DS, Arkle RS, Waits LP (2011) Molecular Detection of Vertebrates in Stream Water: A Demonstration Using Rocky Mountain Tailed Frogs and Idaho Giant Salamanders. PLoS ONE 6(7): e22746. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022746.

There are many sampling and statistical challenges to evaluating the effects of management actions on a community of often cryptic and occasionally rare species. ARMI PIs Susan Walls and Hardin Waddle teamed with USGS statistician Robert Dorazio to develop an extension of a single species model to estimate simultaneous temporal changes in probabilities of detection, occupancy, colonization, extinction and species turnover using ARMI data collected in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley of Louisiana from 2002 – 2006.

The statistical modeling approach is reported in a recent issue of The Journal of Wildlife Management. The paper demonstrates how the flexibility and utility of occupancy models makes them such a valuable tool for asking the different kinds of questions that are relevant to resource managers.

Susan C. Walls, J. Hardin Waddle and Robert M. Dorazio. 2011. Estimating Occupancy Dynamics in an Anuran Assemblage from Louisiana, USA. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 75(4):751-761. 2011.

Humans change the landscape to obtain food, fiber, and energy. This process of change occurs parcel by parcel, landowner by landowner, but often sums to extensive regions of change. Humans have altered the landscapes throughout much of the midwestern United States significantly since EuroAmerican settlement. Nowhere have landscape and habitat changes been more dramatic than in Iowa.

A look at historical landscape conditions in Iowa can provide important background for understanding where amphibians and other species can live there today. We performed such a retrospective analysis to help us assess the environmental benefits from conservation programs supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Our results illustrate widespread landscape and habitat changes in Iowa, including a statewide homogenization of formerly more diverse regional patterns of wetlands.

We first turned back the clock by examining digitized maps of archived land-cover information collected during the 1830s-1850s via surveys contracted by the Government Land Office. This information was intended to promote private ownership and settlement. Surveyors were required to measure and map the land cover they encountered along transects that became Iowa’s road system. Quilting the digitized maps provided a glimpse of the past across Iowa (Figure 1A), when the landscape was dominated by grasslands (covering 80% of the surface area) and woodlands (covering 18% of the surface area). Today, grasslands occur only on about 5% of the landscape and woodlands on about 7%, with the former replaced largely by cropland and the latter by pasture and hay fields (Figure 1B).

[CAPTION]Figure 1. Iowa land cover in the mid-1800s (A) and as of 2001 (B, mapped with data from the National Land Cover Database, http://www.mrlc.gov/nlcd.php). Figure used with permission from the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, see Gallant et al. (2011).[/CAPTION] [IMG]Figure1.png[/IMG]

Wetlands in the 1800s were distributed in regional patterns. Moderate to high densities of wetlands occurred in the Des Moines Lobe (the southern extent of the Prairie Potholes Region), Missouri Alluvial Plain, Iowan Surface, and Mississippi Alluvial Plain ecoregions (Figure 2A, C). Wetlands were naturally less abundant elsewhere in Iowa because the hydrogeologic characteristics of the landscape did not favor wetland formation. Wetlands are distributed more evenly across Iowa today (Figure 2B) due, for example, to humans draining prairie-pothole wetlands in the Des Moines Lobe to improve land for crops, and impounding water in other ecoregions to support livestock and recreation and to control flooding. Thus, in addition to altering upland habitat, humans dramatically changed surface-water habitat for amphibians and other species across Iowa.

[CAPTION]Figure 2. Distribution of wetlands mapped with data from the Government Land Office (A) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s National Wetlands Inventory (B; http://www.fws.gov/wetlands ). Ecoregions (C; http://www.epa.gov/wed/pages/ecoregions/moia_eco.htm ) are: 40a=Loess Flats and Till Plains, 47a=Loess Prairies, 47b=Des Moines Lobe, 47c=Iowan Surface, 47d=Missouri Alluvial Plain, 47e=Steeply Rolling Loess Prairies, 47f=Rolling Loess Prairies, 47m=Western Loess Hills, 52b=Paleozoic Plateau/Coulee Section, 72d=Upper Mississippi Alluvial Plain. Figure modified and used with permission from the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, see Gallant et al. (2011).[/CAPTION] [IMG]Figure2.png[/IMG]

Patterns of soil characteristics across Iowa also provided evidence today’s wetlands are distributed differently from those of the past. We compiled a statewide map depicting soils formed under repeated seasonally wet conditions through time (hydric soils) and found wetlands would have been most common in the Des Moines Lobe, Missouri Alluvial Plain, Western Loess Hills, Iowan Surface, and Mississippi Alluvial Plain ecoregions (Figure 3) and less common in other ecoregions.

[CAPTION]Figure 3. Percent of local surface area covered by hydric soils mapped with data from the Soil Survey Geographic Database (http://soils.usda.gov/survey/geography/ssurgo ). Figure used with permission from the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, see Gallant et al. (2011).[/CAPTION] [IMG]Figure3.png[/IMG]

We obtained further evidence on the nature of changes in wetland distributions over time from the National Wetlands Inventory database (http://www.fws.gov/wetlands ). Distinguishing created wetlands from those more natural in origin (though, even these typically have been altered in various ways) showed the majority of created wetlands occurred in ecoregions that historically did not support many wetlands (Figure 4).

[CAPTION]Figure 4. Wetlands created through impoundments and excavation compared with wetlands of more natural origins, mapped from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s National Wetlands Inventory database (http://www.fws.gov/wetlands ). Figure used with permission from the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, see Gallant et al. (2011).[/CAPTION] [IMG]Figure4.png[/IMG]

We also learned wetlands in all Iowa ecoregions are smaller today than in the past, and their size ranges now are much more similar across ecoregions.

Our results help illustrate how humans have eliminated or altered much of the native upland and wetland habitat for amphibians in Iowa during the past 150 years. The agricultural practices responsible for many of these changes continue to pose challenges to the persistence of extant amphibian populations in the form of tilling, pesticide and fertilizer applications, livestock use of wetlands, habitat fragmentation, and effects on microclimates, among others. Understanding the array of stressors impinging upon current habitat and populations in Iowa relative to historical land cover and human activity provides us essential context for helping the U.S. Department of Agriculture determine the environmental benefits of their conservation programs in the State. Given the nature and extent of habitat loss, alteration, and fragmentation in Iowa, maximizing such benefits is an important goal.

For additional information:

Gallant, A.L., Sadinski, W., Roth, M.F., and Rewa, C.A., 2011, Changes in historical Iowa land cover as context for assessing the environmental benefits of current and future conservation efforts on agricultural lands: Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, v. 66, no. 3, p.67A-77A. (http://www.jswconline.org/content/66/3/67A.full.pdf+html ).

Imagine sitting at your computer and listening to amphibians that called at a remote wetland late in the evening when no humans were present. Curious, you then decide to listen to amphibians that called at the same time on the same date at many other wetlands in different geographic regions and later analyze all the sounds amphibians, birds, and other sources produced at each wetland to visualize and compare the soundscapes in more detail. The information at your fingertips would be rich far beyond anything available to you previously. Due in part to the ongoing efforts of ARMI scientists, these imagined capabilities are now real and our ability to assess the population statuses of amphibians that call has improved dramatically.

Ecologists long have imagined how advanced digital sound recorders and analytical software could improve amphibian research and conservation. First and foremost, perhaps, such tools would provide an unprecedented ability to collect more comprehensive data on calling activity and dynamics. These tools also would help reduce or eliminate limitations associated with commonly employed human surveys of calling amphibians. These limitations often include: insufficient numbers of surveyed sites or repeat surveys to accurately reflect the presence of target species or to satisfy statistical requirements; variable, but typically undocumented, errors among surveyors in identifying sounds; non-standardized sampling methods of insufficient rigor to promote comparative surveys across large spatial scales or permit straightforward integration with data collected via satellite and other ground-based sensors; and a complete lack of archived sounds from survey sites. Only recently have cost-effective, sophisticated, digital acoustic recorders necessary to record autonomously, and frequently, during extended field deployments become available commercially. And, very importantly, software required to meaningfully analyze voluminous quantities of digital call data has been developed.

Since 2005, scientists from ARMI’s Midwest Region (ARMI-MR) have worked specifically to facilitate improvements in the development and availability of cost-effective acoustic recorders and new analytical software. We needed these tools to enable us to build partnerships and leverage resources to study amphibian populations in ways and places we could not do alone. These are key ARMI objectives to help meet regional and national goals. The recent availability of improved acoustic recorders and analytical software has proven to be the cornerstone of our region’s success in leading the development and implementation of a growing network of partners and research sites. This network is focused on assessing the statuses of amphibian populations relative to global change and related variables along environmental gradients in the United States and Canada ( https://www.umesc.usgs.gov/twgcrn.html ). Since we implemented our first network field sites in 2008, our results from using improved recorders and analytical software clearly have demonstrated their value for surveying and monitoring populations of calling amphibians.

To briefly illustrate some of these results, first listen to this five-minute recording we made at a wetland in the St. Croix National Scenic Riverway in Minnesota at 11 p.m. on June 7, 2008:

SC4DBI108008_20080607_230000.mp3

The sounds are dominated by calls from eastern gray treefrogs (Hyla versicolor), with less frequent calls of Cope’s gray treefrogs (H. chrysoscelis) and American toads (Bufo americanus). Figure 1 shows the spectrogram from 0 minutes-11 seconds to 0 minutes-15 seconds of this recording. The calls of eastern gray treefrogs and an American toad are evident in the swath of green and yellow colors spanning approximately 800-4000 Hz on the left axis. The thin band of green color spanning approximately 1600-1800 Hz that first is visible about 12 seconds into the recording is the call of an American toad. The remainder of the sounds represented here are treefrogs. Note that within the broader frequency range of treefrog sounds, the greatest sound intensity (yellow) spanned approximately 2000-2500 Hz and the next most-intense band spanned approximately 800-1400 Hz.

Because we scheduled this recorder to record automatically for five minutes at the top of every hour from early April through early August, we can use a contour plot to examine the frog and toad calls on June 7th within the context of all or a portion of the typical calling season for these species at this site (Figure 2). The colors in this plot indicate relative decibel levels (0 highest, -87 lowest) of sound recorded across frequencies from May 1st through June 30th of 2008. This view illustrates that the calls recorded at 11 p.m. on June 7th occurred on one of the peak calling dates for gray treefrogs and American toads at this site in 2008. It also shows when other peaks occurred. Similarly, one can interpret decibel levels in other unique frequency ranges in terms of sound events for birds, insects, humans, and other sources to characterize the entire soundscape at and near this wetland.

Thus, this relatively simple example demonstrates that we can program digital recorders to record autonomously at regular times in remote locations over an entire season and obtain remarkable recordings of calling amphibians and other sounds. We also can use sophisticated analytical and graphics software to listen to recordings and analyze them to determine if and when amphibians were calling. Using such an integrated acoustic analysis, we can measure species presence and model occupancy over time, compare data with measurements from other sensors to compare calling activity, presence, and occupancy with environmental conditions at different scales, and retain the recordings as part of rich acoustic archives for a site that can be revisited at will. These are remarkable advances in our ability to assess the statuses of populations of calling amphibians at local, regional, and broader scales over time.

With Easter around the corner, Southern California biologists are playing bunny and hiding some 300 eggs in the wild.

But these are tiny, gelatinous eggs that belong to Rana muscosa -- the mountain yellow-legged frog (also know as the Sierra Madre yellow-legged frog). And biologists are hiding these eggs in a chilly stream in the James San Jacinto Mountains Reserve near Idyllwild, California, in an ongoing, collaborative effort to preserve this endangered amphibian.

On April 14, researchers from USGS and the San Diego Zoo will release these eggs, which were laid by captive frogs at a zoo laboratory 90 miles away. This field expedition is part of a larger USGS-led partnership to study the Southern California population of the mountain yellow-legged frog, which is federally listed as endangered with only 200 adult frogs remaining in the wild.

USGS Western Ecological Research Center biologists Adam Backlin and Liz Gallegos lead the annual population monitoring and captures of the frogs, while the San Diego Zoo, Los Angeles Zoo and Fresno Chaffee Zoo manage captive breeding programs. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and California Department of Fish and Game are responsible for the frog's management and recovery, and the University of California Reserve System protects some of their new stream homes.

"We're hoping that we also see some maturing frogs from last year's batch of released tadpoles, when we head out to release the eggs on Thursday," says Backlin, who has been preparing the eggs' new home in the 50-degrees-cold stream waters.

The eggs will be placed in a cage made of window screening, and should hatch out tadpoles over the coming weeks. The cage also helps researchers count how many tadpoles actually hatched, and protect them for a little while before they are released to their freedom -- hopefully to survive nature's hazards and grow into adult frogs that help repopulate this dwindling species.

"Researchers and managers know that the San Jacinto Reserve once had a yellow-legged frog population in the mid-1990's," says Backlin, who is based in Irvine. "This particular area is already protected land, closed off from human activities and is easy for us researchers to hike to and monitor. So it seemed a safe location to pick for a reintroduction effort."

Southern California mountain yellow-legged frogs are now only found in the San Gabriel, San Bernardino and San Jacinto mountains. A group of San Gabriels frogs were rescued after the 2009 Station Fire, and those are currently being cared for at the Fresno Chaffee Zoo.

Meanwhile, the Los Angeles Zoo also has a group of San Jacinto frogs, whose latest batch of 500 eggs will be hatched into tadpoles in preparation for a June release.

This project is one of many efforts under the USGS Amphibian Research and Monitoring Initiative, which was chartered by congressional mandate to study the troubling amphibian declines in the U.S. and around the world.

New findings from USGS and Taiwanese researchers suggest that butachlor has significant reproductive impacts on frogs even below the recommended application concentration. Butachlor (N-butoxy-methyl-2-chloro-20,60-diethyl-actanilide) is the most commonly used herbicide on rice paddy fields in Taiwan and throughout Southeast Asia. Paddy fields are man-made habitats that are commonly used for reproduction by many species of frogs, but, little is known regarding the ecological and physiological effects of butachlor on frogs.

A recent study published in Ecotoxicology (Liu et al. 2011) examined acute and chronic effects of butachlor on tadpoles of the alpine cricket frog (Fejervarya limnocharis), an Asian species that breeds in rice paddies when they are first flooded. The timing coincides with typical butachlor application regimes, and because of the timing of their breeding behavior cricket frogs can be exposed to higher concentrations of butachlor than other frogs.

Tadpoles were hatched from egg masses collected from paddy fields in Taiwan, and then assigned to treatments of zero, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, 1.6 and 3.2 mg/l of butachlor. All concentrations were below the recommended application rate of 4.8 mg/l of butachlor in paddy water. The experiments showed that 0.87 mg/l of butachlor would kill 50% of the tadpoles after 96 hours of exposure -- a concentration far below the recommended application rate.

Although the results suggested that cricket frog tadpoles were less sensitive than other amphibians that breed in rice paddy fields -- such as the narrow-mouthed toad (Microhyla ornata; 0.53 mg/l) and Guenther’s frog (Rana guentheri; 0.74 mg/l) -- the surviving tadpoles still exhibited a range of impacts, including delayed metamorphosis. Also, butachlor was genotoxic to tadpoles; the number of DNA strand breaks in the red blood cells of cricket frog tadpoles increased with increasing butachlor concentrations.

Butachlor likely has widespread negative impacts on many species of amphibians, although the severity depends on each species’ sensitivity, butachlor's short half-life and the pattern and timing of its application. Staggered spraying in adjacent fields may create refugia with lower butachlor concentrations, which adult frogs may be able to detect.

This study was supported by a Taiwan National Science Council Grant. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the US Government. The study is contribution 417 of the USGS Amphibian Research and Monitoring Initiative (ARMI).

For further reading:

Liu Wan-Yi, Wang Ching-Yuh, Wang Tsu-Shing, Gary M. Fellers, Lai Bo-Chi, Kam Yeong-Choy. 2011. Impacts of the Herbicide Butachlor on the Larvae of a Paddy Field Breeding Frog (Fejervarya limnocharis) in Subtropical Taiwan. Ecotoxicology 20(2): 377-394. doi: 10.1007/s10646-010-0589-6 USGS: http://www.werc.usgs.gov/ProductDetails.aspx?ID=4239

WERC Publication Brief: Rice Field Herbicide Butachlor Is Toxic to Taiwanese Frog Tadpoles. Updated April 2011. http://www.werc.usgs.gov/ProductDetails.aspx?ID=4243

WERC Point Reyes Field Station. http://www.werc.usgs.gov/pointreyes

In many national parks, high-elevation biota are severely threatened by climate change. An assessment of the impacts of climate change is required for efficient spending of funds, proper management of rare and endangered species, and effective conservation of National Park Service biological resources. The decision facing National Park Service managers is to choose among management actions which may mitigate the potential negative effects of climate change. Resource managers at Shenandoah National Park (SHEN) need to develop a management plan and evaluate ongoing management actions with respect to P. shenandoah which anticipates the effects of climate change on the species, includes a desire to limit active management, and is sensitive to other aspects of the high-elevation ecosystem. Our ultimate goal is to develop an iterative state-based decision process, based on information from a monitoring program designed to inform decision makers on the distribution of P. shenandoah. We developed a rapid prototype of the decision during a one-week workshop at the National Conservation Training Center, which included participants from the National Park Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, University of Virginia, US Geological Survey and ARMI researchers.

The federally endangered salamander P. shenandoah is found nowhere else on earth except within the boundaries of Shenandoah National Park, and its entire known range consists of approximately 6 square kilometers of high elevation (>900m) forested habitat, distributed across three mountain peaks. It is believed that P. shenandoah has become restricted by competition with the red backed salamander (Plethodon cinereus), which is believed to have expanded from the lowlands with a changing climate since the Pleistocene. P. shenandoah s presence is strongly influenced by elevation and aspect, presumably in relation to temperature and moisture gradients and associated central and southern Appalachian high elevation forest types.
Both temperature and humidity are expected to change in the Mid-Atlantic in the next few decades but the uncertainty among global climate models is large (Polsky et al., 2000). Global climate models generally predict warmer and wetter conditions in the Mid-Atlantic region with an increase in average temperature ranging from 1 to 5 C over the next 10 to 100 years (Hawkins et al., 2011). There is considerable uncertainty in downscaling global climate models to areas in complex mountainous terrain, and these projections need to be refined for the Shenandoah National Park. We applied a formal, structured process for decision making, which can be summarized as comprised of 5 interrelated parts, addressed in succession, and driven by a focus on values-based objectives. Our objectives include ecological (e.g., P. shenandoah persistence) and procedural (e.g., adhere to park policy) objectives, which we treat as fundamental desires which must be considered simultaneously. For the rapid prototype, we considered four fundamental objectives:

1. Maintain Plethodon shenandoah persistence within Shenandoah National Park
2. Adhere to park policy
3. Maximize public acceptance of management of salamander habitats
4. Minimize cost of management

To link the objectives with a suite of potential management actions identified during the workshop, we are incorporating down-scaled climate data directly into models predicting P. shendandoah occupancy. This will enable us to provide an explicit link between habitat conditions, P. shenandoah and P. cinereus occupancy, and changes in the species’ distributions under future climate scenarios. The resulting model can then be used for assessing population viability under future climate scenarios, considering varying levels of environmental variation, environmental autocorrelation, and competition with P. cinereus. It will also be used to investigate the effects of different management actions and various intensities of these actions on the population persistence of P. shenandoah.

Uncertainty is present in all aspects of this decision problem. The ecology of the species and the expectation of future climate conditions under climate change were two major sources of uncertainty identified during the workshop. The relationship between P. Shenandoah occupancy and persistence, and the effects each management alternative on the persistence of P. shenandoah were identified during the workshop.

We plan to address uncertainty in four ways: first, we are designing a set of experiments which will elucidate the ecology of P. shenandoah, particularly with respect to our expectation about how climate variables (temperature and humidity) may influence competition with P. cinereus. Second, we will combine field observations of temperature and humidity to calibrate downscaled climate models, which will provide site-specific estimates of future climate conditions under a range of likely climate scenarios. Third, we plan to develop a population viability analysis to reduce the uncertainty about the relationship between occupancy and persistence. Finally, we will conduct additional surveys outside of the known distribution, to determine the true range limits of the species. Reducing these uncertainties will help inform the effect that the alternative management actions may have on P. shenandoah occupancy.

A dedicated session highlighting studies conducted by the USGS Amphibian Research and Monitoring Initiative (ARMI) in the West was held at the joint annual meeting of the Society for Northwestern Vertebrate Biology and Washington Chapter of The Wildlife Society at Gig Harbor, Washington on March 25th. The session, organized by Steve Corn, Research Zoologist at the Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center in Missoula, Montana, included presentations by ARMI scientists from five different science centers and addressed the main themes of ARMI since its inception in 2000: monitoring of status and trends of amphibian populations, research into causes of amphibian declines, and development of new sampling methods.

Presenters, followed by the title of their talks, included: Gary Fellers, Western Ecological Research Center, Point Reyes National Seashore, CA (Population size, survival, longevity, and movements of Rana draytonii, and R. sierrae at two closely monitored sites: tracking population trends); Mike Adams, Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, Corvallis, OR (Does the probability of local extinction for northern red-legged frogs relate to introduced fish or bullfrogs?); Nate Chelgren, Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, Corvallis, OR (Spatial and temporal variation in the demography of coastal tailed frogs (Ascaphus truei): isolating aquatic from terrestrial stage dynamics); Erin Muths, Fort Collins Science Center, Fort Collins, CO (Compensatory effects of recruitment and survival on population persistence); Tara Chestnut, Oregon Water Science Center, Portland, OR, (The ecology of the amphibian chytrid fungus, Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in the aquatic environment); Blake Hossack, Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center, Missoula, MT (Wildfire and fragmentation: effects on amphibian populations and associated nematodes); David Pilliod, Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, Boise, ID (Introducing an automated pattern recognition program for leopard frogs); and Steve Corn, Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center, Missoula, MT (How well do call indices represent abundance of breeding anurans?).

The ARMI Program has been on the leading edge of monitoring and amphibian research since its inception in 2000. The ten USGS scientists who function as “Regional Principal Investigators” are responsible for monitoring and conducting amphibian research on Department of Interior lands across the seven ARMI Regions. The ARMI program is an example of a multi-disciplinary partnership, and we have a pathologist and several hydrologists who partner with the scientists on monitoring and research.

ARMI is dedicated to developing the next generation of managers and researchers, and has supported the Declining Amphibian Task Force’s seed grant program for several years. The Regional PIs work with technicians, college students and post-docs on projects that give the newer biologists opportunities to stretch their technical skills. ARMI has directly or indirectly supported 24 graduate students, resulting in 14 Ph.D. dissertations and 10 Master’s theses at universities across the country.

ARMI scientists have identified novel diseases, studied the effects of agricultural practices, forest management, invasive species, livestock grazing, and wildfires on the survival of individuals and species richness; predicted possible outcomes of climate change and diagnosed mass mortality events to name only a few of our research activities. ARMI has worked with partners across academia and State and Federal agencies to develop and evaluate management and conservation actions for amphibians. As a result of these projects, ARMI scientists have produced more than 375 publications, including several books, multiple book chapters, and peer reviewed articles in at least 74 different scientific journals.

ARMI looks forward to the next decade of innovative research and exciting collaborations.

Rocky Mountain National Park (RMNP) has historically been a home to boreal toads (Bufo boreas boreas). Since the 1970s the number of toad populations in Colorado and in the Park has declined. Now there are only three locations where breeding is occurring in RMNP. The USGS Fort Collins Science Center has been studying boreal toads in RMNP for over 15 years and has documented population declines coincident with the detection of the amphibian chytrid fungus.

After 4 years of surveys, disease testing, and planning specific to this effort, RMNP is collaborating with USGS and the Colorado Division of Wildlife to reintroduce boreal toads to a site on the west side of the Park. The site is typical of historical toad habitat in the park, has only a small population of chorus frogs (Pseudacris maculata), no evidence of the amphibian chytrid, and no fish. Although most of the wetland dries by the end of summer, deeper waters in the middle provide a refuge for late-developing amphibian larvae. Boreal toad tadpoles do not overwinter, and therefore must grow and metamorphose before the onset of freezing temperatures and snow, making this water refugia important.

This year over 14,000 tadpoles were released by a team of over 40 volunteers on June 25th. This exercise involved carrying plastic bags filled with water and about 300 tadpoles per bag up two miles of trail and into the site. The tadpoles were hatched at the Colorado Division of Wildlife’s Native Species Hatchery in Alamosa, Colorado. The parents of these tadpoles were wild caught boreal toads from RMNP.

This effort involved over 40 volunteers including representatives from the Park Service, U.S. Geological Survey, Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Forest Service, Colorado State University, the Colorado Division of Wildlife and non-governmental agencies.

This was Year 1 of the planned three years of tadpole releases for this site. Boreal toads, if they can survive the tadpole stage and successfully metamorphose, take three to four years to reach sexual maturity and return to their natal pond to breed. Tracking these tiny toads is extremely difficult between metamorphosis and their return to the pond. Multiple releases over several years increase the chances that some will survive and return to breed, and is patterned after a successful reintroduction of Natterjack toads in England.

In addition to the tadpoles, seven adult boreal toads, animals that were in excess of those needed for the captive breeding stock at the hatchery, were also released. These animals, four males and 3 females, were released in early summer after receiving a hormone injection to encourage breeding. Each animal was fitted with a radio transmitter and will be tracked 2 to 3 times per week over the summer until autumn when the batteries on the transmitters will be drained.

Tadpoles are generally considered the best lifestage to use for reintroduction efforts; however, releasing adults also can be advantageous. Released adults can act as “sentinels” to detect disease, particularly the amphibian chytrid fungus. Although the site was tested using non-invasive swabs from captured chorus frogs as well as a newer technique to test the water for this fungus, the lack of a positive test does not provide certainty that the site is disease-free. Having adult toads in the habitat gives researchers the opportunity to monitor susceptible animals for the disease over the course of time. Each animal will be tested every week for the amphibian chytrid fungus and, if the organism is found, this information will be used in determining the course of the reintroduction effort. In addition to serving as sentinels for disease, released animals are being followed closely to determine how they respond to their new habitat, how they make use of it, and how far they roam from it – all critical information for other reintroduction efforts with adult amphibians. Information collected on the released adults, such as body temperature and micro-habitat characteristics, is contributing to another collaborative study (Idaho State University and USGS) on boreal toads that is focusing on toad and site temperatures in relation to the amphibian chytrid fungus at sites in Colorado and Wyoming.

Overall, the multi-year reintroduction of tadpoles and adult boreal toads represents an extraordinary example of inter-agency cooperation in working towards the recovery of a state endangered amphibian.

For further reading:

Muths, E., Corn, P.S., Pessier, A.P., and Green, D.E., 2003, Evidence for disease related amphibian decline in Colorado: Biological Conservation, v. 110, p. 357–365.

Muths, E., 2003, Homerange and movements of boreal toads in undisturbed habitats: Copeia, v. 2003, no. 1, p. 161–165.

Denton, J.S., and Beebee, T.J.C., 1996, Habitat occupancy by juvenile natterjack toads (Bufo calamita) on grazed and ungrazed heathland: Herpetological Journal, v. 6, no. 2, p. 49–52.